Summarize the points about Artificial reefs in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage.
One of the attraction subject through the sea is construction artificial reefs that is under debate. I the lecture talks about the advantages of building and releasing this artificial reefs to the sea but in the lecture professor point out some drawbacks of this kinds reefs.
Firstly, The first statement of article states about artificial reefs can develop and increase the competiveness ability of small-fisher compared to large competitor. Small fisher can make this reefs in unknown or secret place to advocate their professional career and their community for burgeoning their economic. Conversely, in the lecture professor completely disagree with reading because of following reason. Speaker stated that this idea not comprehensive in due to can caused to insecurity and increase the illegal construction of reefs in unknown place. It is better small-fisher informed public to this reefs in order to maintain and security of their reefs.
Secondly, Artificial reefs can cause the increase the attraction of fish and other marine creature on it. Different marine will take place on this type of reefs and will be cause the increasing of marine population on their community in location. In the lecture repudiate this advantage of artificial reefs by compelling explanation. Artificial reefs do not increase on fish population while actually they disturb of inhabitant by instability of equilibrium of community.
Finally, In the article stated that artificial reefs can increase the using of recycle material that would not use for other application or purpose. Artificial reefs can construct by some outdated car and other objects that is hard to recycle or dispose. These material can be used as a cheap, environment-friendly application. The speaker says that this not a good way or not pragmatic to reuse of this material as reefs in the sea. To put in another way, this maybe cause to destruction of environment or marine habitats by release of chemical toxin and dislocate of some creature in the storm condition.
- Do you agree or disagree People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group 76
- adaptation of Broccoli in temperate climates with mild summers 3
- bb 3
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 66
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e professor point out some drawbacks of this kinds reefs. Firstly, The first state...
^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... better small-fisher informed public to this reefs in order to maintain and security...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...ke place on this type of reefs and will be cause the increasing of marine population on ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29102167183 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02369495283 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486068111455 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1066713102 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17362350073 0.272083759551 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696212064248 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442263336911 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123934109933 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423435862236 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.