summarize the points made in the lecture, also state how they cast doubt on the information presented in the passage.
According to lecture there are some historical evidences, which provides information opposing the content of the passage.
First of all, as the professor mentions, archaeological sites present in the northern regions of america are much older. Some sites are even 19000 years old, way long ago the invention of the Clovis theory and the beringia bridge.
Apart from that, the human colonies may take centuries to migrate from one place to another. Second, The oldest found evidence of the people present in north america does not match with the information provided in passage. According to some DNA analysis, the tresses of continent look to be around 40000 years older, the way before migration has taken place. The analysis casts doubt as these all migration has taken place only before 11000 to 13000 years ago.
The archaeological data and the DNA analysis data does not tally with the short of information. The evidences clearly casts doubt on the information presented.
- summarize the points made in the lectures, being sure to explain how they answer specific problem mention in the passage. 80
- Describe main topics discussed in lecture, show how they cast doubt on the ideas presented in the passage. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should do anything they can to make a profit. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position." 76
- summarize the points made in the lecture, also state how they cast doubt on the information presented in the passage. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Businesses should do anything they can to make a profit Use specific reasons and examples to support your position 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ot tally with the short of information. The evidences clearly casts doubt on the in...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'apart from', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284090909091 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.158904122519 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0795454545455 0.0723426182421 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0681818181818 0.0435111971325 157% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0277247811725 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.107954545455 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0340909090909 0.0370669169778 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6031962414 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0340909090909 0.0208969081088 163% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.147727272727 0.128158765124 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00568181818182 0.0158828679856 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00568181818182 0.0114777025283 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 986.0 1645.83664459 60% => OK
No of words: 159.0 271.125827815 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20125786164 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.04852973271 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339622641509 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276729559748 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201257861635 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125786163522 0.113142543107 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6031962414 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 54.4865452235 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6666666667 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0226215607 49.3711431718 43% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 132.220823453 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 45.3396226415 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.20588235294 1.90840788429 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469595359269 0.549887131256 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131342677715 0.142949733639 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110971448786 0.0787303798458 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.705906135704 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156480360344 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256568340067 0.266732575781 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118189436459 0.103435571967 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.335552099621 0.414875509568 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0337056332644 0.0530846634433 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338330064367 0.40443939384 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640086658621 0.0528353158467 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 4.0 10.2958057395 39% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.