Summarize the points made in the lecture , be sure to explain how they answer various problems raised in the reading passage?
The reading passage talks about the disparity involved in the work of a famous dutch painter named Rembrandt. For example, the painting known as Portrait of an Elderly woman in a white Bonnet was actually credited to Rembrandt because of the inherited style of painting and the beautiful expression of the face in the portrait. Some significant points were raised to check if it belonged to Rembrandt or not. Th first problem listed out was the inconsistency in the hat and the coat in dressing of the women wold never have been tolerated by the painter of this stature. Moreover,Rembrandt was known for making detailed portraits that also had effects of light and shadow which appeared doubtful because of the face was illuminated by the black fur collar because of reflection which would indeed absorb light. The rear side of the painting confirmed that the panel was made by joining several small pieces of wood together which was quite odd keeping in mind the previous paintings done by Rembrandt and therefore this painting was removed from the official catalogue of Rembrandt's painting.
However, these false claims were challenged in the lecture, where the lecturer talks about how the committee that was set up for finding an answer to this disparity. The committee after careful examination of the painting concluded that there is disparity in the dressing sense and therefore the first claim was nullified. The second was also rejected because of the c that the hat had material which reflected the light and the face was illuminated because of the light reflected by the hat still indicating that the painting has a role of light and shadows. When the quality and type of wood was tested it was found to be exactly similar to the wood panels that Rembrandt has used in all previous paintings. The extra pieces of wood were attached to add the features of fur collar , the hat to have more interesting portrait developed and thus the third claim was also rejected by the committee.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | aniketsole | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture with the way they oppose to what is given in the passage as well. 3
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a large city versus living in a small town. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Your friend has decided to switch careers, but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 90
- Your friend has decided to switch careers, but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
... the coat in dressing of the women wold never have been tolerated by the painter of this statur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 580, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Rembrandt
...by the painter of this stature. Moreover,Rembrandt was known for making detailed portraits...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 783, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tached to add the features of fur collar , the hat to have more interesting portra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90532544379 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63935817415 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511834319527 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7290209521 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0624020149063 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315725174873 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372705126268 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049047318801 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00699490560986 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.