Summarize the points made in lecture, being sure to explain how they contradict specific points made in reading passage.
The reading text and lacture both are about the power of information. The Author of this article believes that, politial power is denoted to the education people. The lecturer is dispute all this point by giving his own view on this topic.
Firstly, The author f this article is state that,most of the peoples are getting their stand by reading breaking news and print media. On the other hand lecturer is saying that Fact does not change mind of the people. Additionally, he satat that peoples are not caring about this fact and information. So, that is not effective for the human mind.
Secondlly, Reading text suggest that educated peoples are analyzing the information and making their own opinion. On the flip side, The lecturer stance that peoples are only believed on that fact and not making their own opinion. Moreover, fact can make foundation of that belief, what they formulated previously. Hence, it will increasing their certainity in past belief.
Finally, The Author of this article state says that accurate information is an only solution to that problem. In contrast, the lecturer stating that in the threaten stage the human mind is not accept any information. On top of that, he says that political people is taking benefits of this stage to control the people.
To conclude, the reading text and lecture both are emphasizing on the wealth of information. The lecturer is effectively resist all the point made in text by placing his perspective.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
- Integrated essay advantages and disadvantages of earthworms on earth s ecosystem 73
- In 1939 an archaeological excavation in southeastern England revealed a grave dating to the seventh century CE The grave contained a 13 meter long ship filled with jewelry and other precious objects The presence of such impressive artifacts made it likely 3
- TPO59 80
- TPO60 3
- Ingrate the author s view and lecturer s opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wer is denoted to the education people. The lecturer is dispute all this point by g...
^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , most
... The author f this article is state that,most of the peoples are getting their stand ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...y formulated previously. Hence, it will increasing their certainity in past belief. Fin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... contrast, the lecturer stating that in the threaten stage the human mind is not accept any ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accepted'.
Suggestion: accepted
...he threaten stage the human mind is not accept any information. On top of that, he say...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resisted'.
Suggestion: resisted
...nformation. The lecturer is effectively resist all the point made in text by placing h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02032520325 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58695367205 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483739837398 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9116657 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1875 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121566448974 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429537950008 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056926830953 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081041808033 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727129591613 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.