Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the fact that a coin have been found at a Native American archaeological site is fake.
First, the professor argues that many other objects were found in the site which have scientifically explained by archaeologists. Furthermore, Norse people could communicate to far distances and could brought coins from different parts of North America. So, reading's idea about Norse settlement's distance from the place that coin has found is reputed.
Second, the reading maintains that some archaeologists consider this coin as fake because they found only one coin in site and their strives to find other coins were failed. Nevertheless, the professor argues against this affirmation, and claims that Norse people were not permanent dwellers at North America, and they could brought all other coins to Europe when they packed their stuff in voyage.
Third, the professor questioned reading claim about European coins useless by providing explanations of using these coins as jewelry, necklace, etc. He argues that European silver coins could be attractive to Native American due to beauty and glossy of silver. Hence, they could trade these coins with Native American in cases which didn't related to coins' original application.
Therefor, in summary, the professor has went totally against the facts presented in the reading passage. It states that Norse people could obtain such coins while they traveled to far distances, trade them as jewelry with Native people and brought other valuable coins with themselves to Europe.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 76
- TPO 35 writing 68
- TPO 42 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 60
- If you could go back to some time and place in the past when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints stated in the reading passage about the fact that a coin have been found at ...
^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any other objects were found in the site which have scientifically explained by a...
^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
... communicate to far distances and could brought coins from different parts of North Ame...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...ellers at North America, and they could brought all other coins to Europe when they pac...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ins with Native American in cases which didnt related to coins original application. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...Therefor, in summary, the professor has went totally against the facts presented in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43873517787 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61443852242 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553359683794 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9904947384 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098874387649 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466034728252 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324838404632 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678471003467 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306301765381 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.