Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the rights to migrate of families as well as workers to other nations. The author of the reading states that although this ensures little protection, there are issues regarding to it. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes that this is good enforcement of law as it confer security and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that the major issue of UN convention of right to migrate is that it violates the immigration policy of numerous nation. In addition, it offer rights under international laws and thus goes against the national interest of many. To cite an example, if family recommunicating is coded as right, it will cause over population of area where migration is happened. This eventually impacts on the quality of living degrading to low level. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that the inacted convention rather ensures the life of people under the law. Furthermore, the law to provide protection signed by international law broadcast framework and the UN convention accord guideline about how to develop policy to incorporate the framework.
Similarly, according to the writing, migrator are moving owing to the poverty. Yet, they are seen to be wealthy since various aging country need worker and the migrants obtain opportunity to work overseas. Therefore, in order to restrict migration home country must create opportunity for people so as to employed in their home nation. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that great number of people are travelling either legally or illegally so it will be quiet dangerous for people. Thus, UN convention is enforced with the aim to grant security to threat that the people might face.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on rights to migrants. The speaker effectively challenges the riter's argument.
- Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while other thinks that it is essential for the human kind to continue to explore the universe in which we live Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- The reading and lecture are both about the project assembled by a team The author of the reading states that work can be done effeciently in a group The lecturer disagrees He mentions involving people means creation of distinct ideas which could make work 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice Be sure to use your own words Do not u 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...about the rights to migrate of families as well as workers to other nations. The author of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tion, there are issues regarding to it. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes that thi...
^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...icy of numerous nation. In addition, it offer rights under international laws and thu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ntry must create opportunity for people so as to employed in their home nation. The prof...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1072555205 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75126974637 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.926664075 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2105263158 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073092656281 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220126737748 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299185992232 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489030756826 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041330700403 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.