Marco Polos's Travel book
Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The author introduces topic of communal online encyclopedias. The writer states that the online communal media is considered as less precious than traditional online media. The lecture disagrees. He says that everything doesn’t seem right and views a positive aspect of online communal media and attacks each of the claim made in the passage.
First the author says that online communal medias don’t provide the proper information which considered as a partial and inaccurate means and made a comparison with traditional media. The professor believes there are flaws in the author’s position. He contends that both communal encyclopedias are inaccurate. However, it is easy to correct our mistake in the online reports than traditional media that requires a long duration of time which still be same.
According to the writer, online communal encyclopedias, even though correct entry, are not careful enough as there are unscruptor, hacker to fabricate, delete and hack the reports. The speaker, on the other hand, points out that there are so many crucial factors which prevent from being hacked and make our content private through the use of read-only-format and editor use.
- Summarize the points amde in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- What do you prefer Independent as soon as possible or getting in touch with their parents for a longer time 66
- Summarize the points amde in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Which you prefer idenpendta s early as possible or getting in touch for long time 70
- Marco Polos s Travel book Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...precious than traditional online media. The lecture disagrees. He says that everyth...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 186.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38709677419 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82517545859 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.6375306438 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0719556234969 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297053614733 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034145591509 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04977569547 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116044427005 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.