Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the right to have access to internet. The author of the reading states that every single citizen must have the availability of internet as their lives are circled around the fashion of internet. The lecturer disagrees the idea and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that this will have numerous benefit to society. For instance, internet for business creates job opportunities, support enterpreneurship and so on. Similarly, peoplr can obtain varieties of educational information. Furthermore, politician can raice voice through the various platform offered by internet and thus have transparency with officials. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that although it accord lavish life, they are not crucial factor. Moreover, prior to the invention of internet, people used to have successful and productive life.
Secondly, aacording to the reading, internet as a primary rights perfectly matched the conventional definition of rights which means along with the human rights to have food, shelter and clothes, they must have right to free speech, religion, education and so on. This can be acquired by retaining internet as fundamental right. The speaker, on other hand points out that even though government provide access to internet, they could also restrict the right to use it. Thus, this is something to be taken seriously because why would government limit the access if it has benefited citizen in a productive way.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that it require subsidies from administration in order to aid every citizens in having global access of internet for broad connection, infrastructures, and so on. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they might not enjoy the facility owing to the unavailability of means to operate it. Moreover, it needs a huge sum to install infrastructure which is not worth to expend it.
As we can see the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on making internet access a right. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Student are more influenced by their teacher than their friends Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better to be dishonest Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...circled around the fashion of internet. The lecturer disagrees the idea and attacks...
^^^
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accords'?
Suggestion: accords
... position. He contends that although it accord lavish life, they are not crucial facto...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the access if it has benefited citizen in a productive way. Finally, the reading passage also no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28862973761 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88802551557 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5704051725 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961621093602 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291560677091 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367510718473 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550856326324 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362738576828 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.