Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the unprececedent breakthrough of artificial genome that are able to create unique species. The author of the reading states that although this ia major innovation in the field of science, they are susceptible to create unimaginable threat to environment. The lecturer opposes the idea and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that we cannot predict the shape and size of the artificially created life and how they act. As a result, there is a great probability to do harm than the good. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that if they are carried out in a proper manner, they can be essential in curing various diseases.
Secondly, according to the writing, they do not follow the rules of natural ambiance and tend to compete in a crowed environment. In addition, synthetic microbe are likely to wipe out the agricultural crop and species too. The speaker, on other hand points out that synthetic microbe run remarkably resisting the natural adaptation. Furthermore, they deliberately or accidently make plant species exotic so that we can taste differently in our lunch.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that we need to be serious while introducing new cell in a natural environment as artificial plants and overuse of pesticide could be detrimental to surroundings. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that indeed man made genome can be fearful to the environment yet nature too can do harm to humanity. For instance, threat that are prone to insects, venomous species found in surroundings and so on are doing more harm to the humanity.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on benefit of artificial genome in environment. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Today more people are overweight than ever before In your opinion what are the primary cause of this What measures to overcome this epidemic 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt0 or supports on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- The reading and lecture are both about the company policy which should be made compulsory for the employee It states that company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the company in return The lecturer disagrees He mentions thi 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ate unimaginable threat to environment. The lecturer opposes the idea and attacks e...
^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e contends that if they are carried out in a proper manner, they can be essential in curing variou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08441558442 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90037394138 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7573957778 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1176470588 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176037393399 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453835234083 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418062644338 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855722143807 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385943167744 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.