Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In this set of material the writer and the lecturer are discussing about the ecocertification offered by an international organization. It is debated that while companies over the world want to receive this certificate, American companies also pay attention to it, or not. The writer and the lecturer are totally against each other. Although the writer claims that American people do not interest in ecocertificate for some reasons, the lecturer states that the American companies also want to gain it. The lecturer refutes the writer’s opinion with the following detail and examples.
Firstly, while the writer points out that Americans do not trust advertising that shows a product is high produced or valued, the lecturer opposes this. The lecturer states that Americans distinguishes the difference between real and exaggerated advertises and they trust dependent organizations. Thus they believe ecocertificataion given by an international organization.
Furthermore, although in the writing passage, it is stated that American people tends to buy cheap products without any attention to product’s quality, the lecturer asserts that price is not the only criteria that Americans decide depends on. Their decision based on price only when one competing product is higher or lower than another. However, when the prices are different between two products is small, American people pay attention other qualifications of products when they decide to buy something.
Moreover, the writer claims that American companies generally trade in the domestic field, so they do not need any international certificate. On the contrary, the lecturer states that paying attention to ecocetificatation is not only related to foreign market, it is also related to domestic market. Because if domestic American companies do not interest in the ecocertification, due to the respect of American people to ecocertificated products, foreign companies will start to crowed into American market.
All in all, the lecturer totally opposes the writer’s claims. She rejects the writer’s assertations in all aspects and demonstrates us that ecocertification is highly important in American trade market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- It is important to keep your old friends than t is to make new friends. Do you agree, or disagree with this statament. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your idea. 73
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Do you agree or disagree with this idea Explain it by giving specific examples 87
- There is a listening passage in which the lecturer explains global warming causes, and in the reading passage the writer opposes the lecturer’s ideas. Summarize the point made in the lecture, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people enjoy life more than older people do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your idea. 73
- Read the article about high demand of fossil fuels and a lecture about the reactions of it. Then write and essay to evaluate them. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...and they trust dependent organizations. Thus they believe ecocertificataion given by...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.726443769 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30172061272 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495440729483 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4206671722 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0309772630983 0.272083759551 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129250033745 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0184137594311 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.021309974713 0.162205337803 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265594277466 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.