Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to specific arguments made in the reading passage.
Both the passage and the lecture discuss about the Jane Austen portrait. However, the lecturere creates doubts on what has been discussed in the passage about the portrait of Jane Austen in the following ways.
First, according to the passage, The living family member have endorsed the painting that it of Jane, but the lecturer says that the Jane was dead before these family membors were born. So, their claim does not have a strong support.
Second, according to the passage, Cassandra's sketch of Jane, is very similar to the the painting in terms of facial structure. But according to the lecturer, other memebers of Jane family, were also looked similar to her and lot of her cousins were also sharing the same age group with Jane. So, it is difficult to say with confidence that tha painting is of Jane.
Third, according to the passage, the word of art is very similar to the works of the famous painter of that time, when Jane was teeneger. So this supports the claim that, Ozias Humphrey has painted the Jane painting. In contrast to passage the lecturer says since there is no sign and date, we can't conclude this fact. He adds on further that the canvas which has been used to paint, was only sold when she grew older.
So summarising all these points, we can see how the lecturer is nullyfing the claims of reading passage about the painting of Jane Austen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | prabhat123 | 3 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to specific arguments made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing Computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 75
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Other think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this family' or 'these families'?
Suggestion: this family; these families
...urer says that the Jane was dead before these family membors were born. So, their claim does...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...dras sketch of Jane, is very similar to the the painting in terms of facial structure. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...dras sketch of Jane, is very similar to the the painting in terms of facial structure. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 295, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ays since there is no sign and date, we cant conclude this fact. He adds on further ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int, was only sold when she grew older. So summarising all these points, we can ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72427983539 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23415482468 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543209876543 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7564634857 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0312204983198 0.272083759551 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129971134405 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199778049679 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02275949839 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205668487853 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.