Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage
Experts think that the rapid decline of sea otters on the Alaskan coast can be due to environmental pollution or to predation. The reading suggests the cause being pollution, however the professor supports predation, and refutes the author’s points.
First of all, the professor posits that there is no dead sea otters found near the Alaskan coast in evidence. This shows that sea otters were probably eaten by predators. So the author's claim that due to industrial chemical pollution and oil rigs near the Alaskan coast sea otters are dying is wrong.
Second, the professor argues that Orcas couldn’t find big mammals to eat due to human hunting and started eating small sea mammals that's why other small sea mammals have also declined. This opposes the author’s point that other small sea mammals are also vanishing due to environmental pollution.
Finally, the professor points out that the uneven pattern of sea otters decline in different locations of Alaskan coasts is not due to the uneven concentration of pollutants nearby as author claimed. Actually, Orcas can’t access to shallow and rocky areas due to their big size, so the areas where they can easily reach to sea otters have greater decline of otters than other areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-11 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | Liting Mai | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | kk890528 | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | easonl02526 | 71 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | alicegreen13 | 80 | view |
- Summarize the main points in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The most important factor that influences students success in school is a good teacher. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementThe most important factor that influences students success in school is a good teacher. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being to sure to explain how they challenges specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagreeThere will be fewer cars on the road twenty years from now. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessor supports predation, and refutes the author's points. First o...
^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sor supports predation, and refutes the author's points. First of all...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by predators. So the authors claim that due to industrial chemical pollution and...
^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ng and started eating small sea mammals thats why other small sea mammals have also d...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed. This opposes the author's point that other small sea mammals are also va...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62339268374 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6565381497 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0498835824008 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267628022443 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278651116751 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354371408818 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245932564232 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.