summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on tidal power, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
The source describes the technology available to generate electrical energy using tides. The reading describes the importance of the tidal power energy which could generate four periods of energy every day. Meanwhile, the professor brings drawbacks of using tidal power, how it will affect the environment.
Firstly, the reading claim that tidal power is renewable, non-polluting, and contributes no greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.in addition, this energy provides a useful energy supplement to other sources like fossil fuel. The lecture contradicts this point by acknowledging that, tidal power is harmful to the environment , the quality of the water located near the industrial area is contaminated this will harm local wildlife. Moreover, the increase in solvents in seawater will affect birds and fish.
Secondly, the passage tells us that, dams are constructed to produce electrical energy using tide are very resourceful, as coastal region experience two high tides and two low tides using this we can produce four periods of energy just over 24hours. Notwithstanding technology professor highlighted that, this dams will affect birds and fish who migrate they won't be able to pass the barraged. Due to this fish are getting existent. In addition. People who live near the costal region, especially fisherman they could not be able to navigate and this will abate in economic growth
Finally, the speaker articulated that, although tidal power provides some contribution to the production of energy at the regional level we should consider there are many drawbacks. So she suggests using alternative energy production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Sanmathi G Rao | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sanmathi G Rao | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sanmathi G Rao | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sanmathi G Rao | 90 | view |
| 2015-07-25 | potterazzi | 70 | view |
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on productivity and rewards, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard on apes can communicate, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in reading 85
- compare and contrast your way of living with that of your parents. which way life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...idal power is harmful to the environment , the quality of the water located near t...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nt be able to pass the barraged. Due to this fish are getting existent. In addition....
^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...e to this fish are getting existent. In addition. People who live near the costal region...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53784860558 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87062515632 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601593625498 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.6011941913 49.2860985944 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114739494628 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407733718537 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044970071013 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074474425481 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381716151353 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.