There is no shortage of opinion on whether it is better for students to learn art and literature or math and science. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement; I think it is more important for people to study math and science. The following paragraphs will explain my two major reasons for this opinion.
First of all, science and math are more valuable than art and literature because knowledge of math and science is necessary for understanding and advancing technology. Technology has led this world to become extremely interconnected. The internet, cell phones and airplanes are all technological advances that people use every day and would not be possible without students of math and science inventing them. I heard a story on the news once that illustrates my point quite well. Used plastic is overflowing in landfills and polluting the seas. However, clever scientists have found interesting ways to reuse wasted plastic. In India, they mix thrown out plastic waste with asphalt and use it to pave new roadways. This invention is made possible because of science and math, and it can help solve the pollution problems in the oceans. If students do not continue to learn math and science, then more technologies of the future like this one may never be created. In order to continue making technological advancements, it is better for students to study science and math.
Secondly, math and science are more important subjects because people need to know them in order to save lives and keep everyone healthy. Doctors, nurses, and medical technicians are all former students of science and math. Drawing from my own experience, my brother recently went to college to become a surgeon. He is going to be studying for eight years, and almost all of his classes will be of these types. For example, he is now learning anatomy, algebra, biology, and geometry which are all science and math courses. When he graduates, he will have the skills to heal patients’ illnesses and injuries because he studies these subjects. For the sake of public health, it is more necessary for students to learn math and science than art and literature.
In conclusion, I strongly believe it is more important for students to study science and math than it is to learn about literature and art. This is because math and science provide students the knowledge to advance technology, and the ability to cure the sick and dying people in the world.
Although both the article and the lecture explains the potential effects of using ethanol as a replacement for fossil gas, they have contradicting views regarding the same. While the article is highly about the replacement of ethanol and corroborates its claim using three seemingly convincing facts, the speaker refutes each of these suggestions.
To start with, the article states that since ethanol is a less energy consuming source than gasoline, it is deemed to support individuals through better has mileage, create fuel efficient cars and turn out to be pocket -friendly in the long run. The speaker diminshes this claim on the premise that corn being expensive to produce due to an extensive process of production, transportation and distribution, shall be highly costly. Resultantly, the cost of ethanol shall be exorbitant for the consumers, as against the claims of the author.
Secondly, the passage presents the idea of corn helping the American economy to be self-dependent - thanks to reduced imports of petroleum from foreign countries, thus ameliorating geo-political conditions pertaining to America. Additionally, import taxes shall be reduced, making cost of gas chepaer. To this, the lecturer argues that price of corn may rise owing to substantially higher demands. It shall affect feed for cows and in turn hamper dairy production. This woud not only make the gas prices to shoot up, but also hurt the economy in the long run.
Lastly, the passage explains how shifting to ethanol would be environment friendly as combustion of the same shall release much lesser biofuels, leading to lesser carbon emissions and potential prevention of global warming. The professor, although, finds this claim to be flawed as, according to him, the repercussion effects shall make the demand for corn to rise. As a result, more farmland would be needed to produce the crop, leading to absorption and release of higher amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. In due course of time, the ozone layer is likely to get destroyed.
The author and the speaker, although shares diametrically opposite views on ethanol replacing fossil fuel gas, sparks an enriching deabte on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-11 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 52 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use details and examples to support your answer 70
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 59
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 80
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 93
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 349.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29799426934 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85369649288 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9687272013 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.266666667 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0504172584016 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0195681150305 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209437213172 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0265764642781 0.162205337803 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143901153857 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 63.6247240618 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.