The passage, as well as the lecture, is all about whether anyone is being benefited through the TV program or a guest lecture by a professor who is meant to be in the campus teaching student. The lecturer is seen refuting to each point made in the passage by providing an explanation to it.
According to the lecturer, a professor appearing on television is not good considering his professional background. Most times it is observed that professors who would prepare for such shows are taken lightly on educational base. They might not be invited for important meetings related to university discussion or maybe less paid. Whereas the author makes a point by saying that the professor who appears on television will be well known to everyone watching a show. It can increase professor's as well as the university's reputation to another level.
Similarly, if the professor is attending such open forums and seminar it is not going to benefit the university as it takes a lot of time to prepare the content. Also, it involves a lot of prior preparations related to dressing and planning which if the professor spends time on, will adversely affect education purposes. Even if the passage states that university will be benefited from an increase in publicity and higher donation, the lecturer makes it very clear that nothing is as important as studies of the students.
The passage claims that learning is the output that is gained from making such shows but in reality viewers who see such shows doesn't really understand in-depth knowledge of these topics. For instance, the lecturer states that such educational topics can also be delivered by a reporter who has some knowledge.
This way both the author and the lecturer states their points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage, as well as the lecture, is ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e by providing an explanation to it. According to the lecturer, a professor a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...iversity discussion or maybe less paid. Whereas the author makes a point by saying that...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sitys reputation to another level. Similarly, if the professor is attending...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... related to dressing and planning which if the professor spends time on, will adve...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mportant as studies of the students. The passage claims that learning is the ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t in reality viewers who see such shows doesnt really understand in-depth knowledge of...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a reporter who has some knowledge. This way both the author and the lecture...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, similarly, so, well, whereas, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75067115481 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1569341935 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0708928518691 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028789164771 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280007667037 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360541713506 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313815028425 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.