TOEFL T P O 01 - Integrated Writing Task
In the reading section, the author contends that shortened workweek would benefit companies, the country as a whole, and individual employees who decided to take the option. However, in the listening part, the professor respectively casts doubt on all assertions discussed in the passage by providing three specific points as supports.
In the first place, the writer makes the point that the option of working a four-day workweek would increase company profits because employees would work more efficiently, and as a result, they would make fewer costly mistake. By contrast, in accordance with the speaker, this view does not hold water. He argues that, four-day workweek will force companies to spend more money on training and medical benefits. Also, more workers require more office space and more computers which reduce the company profits.
Furthermore, it is proposed in the reading materials that shortened workweek would decrease the overall unemployment rate. this is because employees workload whould have to be shifted to others. contrary to this belief, the lecturer refutes this viewpoint and maintain that hiring new worker is costly and companies have other choices. they might choose as their employees to work over time to make up difference. Worse, they might raise their expectation and start to expect four-day workers can do same amount of work they used to do in five days. If this happens, no additional job will be created and current jobs will be unpleasant.
at last, the passage claims that this option is better for individuals because they have more free time which can improve their quality of lives. On the other hand, the professor demonstrates a different view. Accourding to him, shortened workweek presents some risks and can reduce job stability. In addition, four-day employees are more likely to lose their job during an economic downturn because companies prefer five-day employees for their management positions to ensure a continues coverage for entire workweek.
- In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to be among the most important in the history of world cinema. To this day, in fact, it remains the American box office c 3
- TOEFL TPO 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TOEFL T P O 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TOEFL TPO 01 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO 1, Integrated Writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...decrease the overall unemployment rate. this is because employees workload whould ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Contrary
...ad whould have to be shifted to others. contrary to this belief, the lecturer refutes th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ostly and companies have other choices. they might choose as their employees to work...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...and current jobs will be unpleasant. at last, the passage claims that this opti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3427672956 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61022390956 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4181378013 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540200245875 0.272083759551 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147086454715 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12572112898 0.0662205650399 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301177072881 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752406766613 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.