The reading and the lecture are both about the advantages or disadvantages of making a team of people to achieve the objectives. The author of the reading belives that a group of people can have more success. The lecturer, nonetheless, thinks that working in groups could be counterproductive.
First af all, the author points that working in groups allows you to share more knowledge. As a result, you can work with more information. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that this may cause some members of the group not to work at all, since that information may be given by another partner. However, if the result is good at the end, the person who has not worked will also be rewarded and benefited form the recognition.
Secondly, the author contends that people in groups can work quickly. The article notes that working in groups allows tasks to be completed sooner. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest that when people work in groups everything is slower. Normally you have to put more things in common. This means having more meetings and taking more time to make decisions.
Finalle, the article establishes that working in groups people are able to find creative solutions because they can help each other and mix their ideas. Besides, the group gives you the determination to not make risky decisions. The lecturer sugest that one person could be ignored by the other partners. The problem comes when the project fail. All of the components of the group will be guilty of not having reached the objectives in an proper way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... group of people can have more success. The lecturer, nonetheless, thinks that work...
^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
.... The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest that when people work in groups everyth...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...he problem comes when the project fail. All of the components of the group will be guilty ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ty of not having reached the objectives in an proper way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of not having reached the objectives in an proper way.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87265917603 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61662425575 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531835205993 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1930473646 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4736842105 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0526315789 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0117824887695 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0048788366677 0.0996497079465 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0206991509522 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00810712549792 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140419532657 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.