Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
The reading and lecture are both about Chevalier de Seingalt who was very popular for writing a memoir of his life and adventures. The author of the reading feels that the reliability of the memoir is ambiguous and vague. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that no memoir is possibly correct but it is a reliable historical source.
To begin with, the author argues that Chevalie was lived in Switzerland and very riched and used vast money for gambling. The author states that if he was riched then why he needs to lean money from a Swiss merchant. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that normally peoples is required time to convert the property to the money. He also mentions that it is possible he needs the money immediately and that's why he needs to borrow it.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the conversation happened between Chevalie and the Vottaire possibly did not capture accurately. Additionally, may be some exact phrases is missing the conversation. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that Chevalie wrote everything in the memoir he remembered. Also, the witness confirmed that he always took note of any conversation.
Thirdly, the author posits that Chevalie escaped from the prison from the ceiling by making a hollow space. He also claims that may be some well-connected political friends helped him for this incident to make the reading interesting. In contrast, the lecturer position is that after escaping from the prision the ceiling needs to repair. He also noted that some proper evidence proved the incident correct if he wants to make the reading interesting why the jailer needs to repair the ceiling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Vivekh0514 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Opak Pulup | 71 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jewel | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | yraj | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | shingwa | 80 | view |
- Animal fossils 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Tpo 52 3
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. 50
- tpo 30A little over 2200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to f 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y of the memoir is ambiguous and vague. The lecturer challenged the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ible he needs the money immediately and thats why he needs to borrow it. Second...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... note of any conversation. Thirdly, the author posits that Chevalie escaped ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02787456446 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69187159995 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522648083624 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4001490158 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8823529412 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184669585196 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591544534231 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076711756632 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121211824711 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771335180974 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.