The reading lists three points to explain the benefit of four-days week work. However, the lecturer contradicts all three thories presented in the reading.
First of all, the reading mentions that the company can save more money because the employees will do the job more efficient. Also, it will not cost more money to hire new people. The lecturer disputes this by saying the company will spend more since they have to give additional training and medical benefit.
Next, according to the passage, it will reduce unempoyment rates. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point. He says that the worker prefer to work five-day week.
Lastly, the reading claims that it will increase employee's quality of life. Nevertheless, the lecture argue that it will reduce their quality instead increase. For example, the company will prefer employees who work five-days week rather than four-days week. Due to this fact, the employees will have less change to become promoted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 1373.03311258 60% => OK
No of words: 159.0 270.72406181 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18867924528 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35519266281 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 419.366225166 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6948037719 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.75 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.25 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305824130445 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105167648 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874976269157 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169182955401 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910946971774 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.93 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.