TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about doing projects and jobs as a group. In this line of thought, the reading states that this idea is good because of three reasons, the first reason is a group has the knowledge, expertise, and skills in wide-range. Second and third reasons are the procedure complete quickly and shining better in a group as working alone. The lecturer, on the other hand, casts doubt on all of the three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage, believing that none of these strategies are practical and lead to the real world. In the rest of the passage, a comparison between them is provided.
First of all, the reading and the listening materials talk about that a group has a wide range of knowledge, expertise, and skills. On the contrary, the lecturer doesn’t give any evidence of rejection or acceptation about this idea.
Second, both the text and the talk discuss a group can reach their goal quickly with creative solutions. The author points out that when some people gathering for doing the same work they can do their assigned work quickly and more creative because they using all of their potential problems solving’s power. However, the lecturer notes that in the group working some people who are a free rider and don’t contribute to others. Also, for doing one work member should have many meeting which this event effect on-time completion of the work. This directly contradicts what the passage indicates.
Eventually, shinning people in the group which are discussed by both the passage and the lecture. The author mentions that people in the group have a better chance to shine and can contribute and employ their idea better. The lecturer rebuts this argument. The lecturer states that when one of the members which are not the chief of the group talks about his/her idea, the chief may rebut that because have not a good knowledge about the mentioned idea. This was another place where experience contradicted the theory.
Sum up, although the passage provides some reasons for a team working, the lecture opposes about the effectiveness and possibility of those reasons.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing TaskIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling 3
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 73
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...urer, on the other hand, casts doubt on all of the three episodes of arguments mentioned i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ter. The lecturer rebuts this argument. The lecturer states that when one of the me...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 363.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98071625344 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51895198643 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498622589532 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8058954646 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0553646899406 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197752898348 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.012807925933 0.0662205650399 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0328080080961 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00832468748968 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.