According to the author, the best to approach a new project is to assemble a group of people in a team for better results. The lecturer, however, states disagreement with this idea. Instead, he believes that assigning a new project to a group of individual isn't effective and efficient approach.
Firstly, the author posits that in a group, there are a greater number of people with skills and expertise which they can contribute to the project. Each member of the group can shine and his/her ideas are recognized and appreciated. This concept is refuted by the lecturer, who claims that in a group, some members might not do anything and some other members might work more for the project. The end result of the project, however, is credited to the whole group where the real contributor is not acknowledged.
Secondly, the passages state that the group comes up with creative decisions made by consent of all the members. This makes the team result more reactive and impactful. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees with this and asserts that the group takes more time for consensual decisions on a topic such that the project is not completed quickly. Also, there might be one or two more influential people in the group who might impose their decisions and neglect team members who don't agree with them. Later, when the project fails, then the whole group is blamed.
All in all, the author asserts that working in a group for a project has several advantages, whereas the lecturer contends that the idea is not the best way to approach a new project.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 73
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 76
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... a new project to a group of individual isnt effective and efficient approach. Fi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... decisions and neglect team members who dont agree with them. Later, when the projec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81111111111 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51093903049 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5100057835 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463895315005 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165152641155 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733603707668 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276460888228 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680051808655 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.