The reading passage and the listening part both are talk about seventeenth century famous painter rembrandth art work. In reading passage discuss about some confusion about rembrandth art work and contrast between works. However, in the listening section professor discuss about the missing information about rembrandth art work and provide some evidence about authentication of rembrandth art work.
First of all, the reading passage claims that inconsistent about a women painting. the women wearing a white linen cap that only servants can use that hat but she also wear a luxurious fur collar ring that servants cannot afford. However, in the lecture professor told that luxurious fur collar ring can added after 100 year later to increase it aristocracy. It a real work of rembrandth .
Secondly, the reading makes the argument about rembrandth another work of light and shadow. But there colur composition is not fit because rembrandth is a master of light and shadow work. The face must reflect the light but below the face the dark fur collar absorbs all light rather that reflect light. In listening states that original painting are right the women light cloth not the dark fur collar dress. Original painting reflects the colour.
Finally, the reading passage argued that a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Originally rembrandth panel made single pieces of wood rather that several pieces. However, the professor provides some evidence that proved that it a rembrandth work. Single piece work and several pieces work are used same tree wood for painting, that's proved that it a rembrandth art work.
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 60
- TPO 44-integrated 71
- TPO 45-integrated 3
- TPO 32 73
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...assage claims that inconsistent about a women painting. the women wearing a white lin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...at inconsistent about a women painting. the women wearing a white linen cap that on...
^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wears'.
Suggestion: wears
... servants can use that hat but she also wear a luxurious fur collar ring that servan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ristocracy. It a real work of rembrandth . Secondly, the reading makes the argu...
^^
Line 8, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...k are used same tree wood for painting, thats proved that it a rembrandth art work....
^^^^^
Line 8, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood for painting, thats proved that it a rembrandth art work.
^^^
Line 8, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proved that it a rembrandth art work.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2433460076 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48327451536 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48288973384 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3132743278 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1875 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192015512441 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774024701912 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557392819184 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122183819292 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697899011102 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.