Both the reading and the listening discuss the facts behind the Rembrandt portrait whether it is attributed to Rembrandt or not. The reading argues that the portrait about the woman with the fur collar couldn't be one of the Rembrandts art work and provides three points of support. However, the lecture casts doubts on all these claims and contradicts the three points that discussed in the reading.
According to the reading, the author says that there are inconsistent in the portrait, since the elements did not fit together. The woman dress very expensive fur collar which is not suited with the white linen cap. However, the professor refutes this idea by explaining that the fur collar was not a part of the original portrait, it was just added one hundred yeas after to increase the value of the portrait.
Secondly, the reading avers that there is disharmony between the woman illuminated face and the dark fur collar since as we all know the dark collar clothes suppose to absorb the light not reflect it so the woman face should not be illuminated in this portrait. On the other hand, the lecturer oppose this point by illustrating that in the original painting the dress color was white that could reflect the light instead of absorbing it.
Finally, the reading claims that the panel of the portrait is made of several pieces glued together and Rembrandt never use a panel such this. Nevertheless, the lecture illustrated this point by demonstrating that when the fur collar to the portrait ,they added more pieces to accommodate it. Besides, the original portrait was from the same tree that Rembrandt's other art work from
- eating at home or at resturant 60
- TPO integrated 46 73
- tpo integrated 26 3
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the listening disc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Both the reading and the listening discuss the facts behind the Rembrandt p...
^^
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ait about the woman with the fur collar couldnt be one of the Rembrandts art work and p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts that discussed in the reading. According to the reading, the author say...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the original portrait, it was just added one hundred yeas after to increase the v...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease the value of the portrait. Secondly, the reading avers that there i...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the light instead of absorbing it. Finally, the reading claims that the pan...
^^^^
Line 11, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s glued together and Rembrandt never use a panel such this. Nevertheless, the lec...
^^
Line 11, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...that when the fur collar to the portrait ,they added more pieces to accommodate it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95323741007 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49214126329 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496402877698 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4898858305 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356608177042 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131334574072 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063429346302 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206452421158 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461650791948 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.