The materials are concerned with the question that how the 'great houses' of Chaco people was used for. The passage supposes three theories for the question. In respond, the lecture casts doubts on these theories, saying that those are unconvincing.
First, the passage tells about the theory that the great houses of Chaco people were residential places. However, the lecture argues that the houses dose not have enough fire place for about 100 families living there. This seriously casts doubt the theory.
The passage continues to explain the second theory about the Chaco's great houses that those were used to stored food supplies. The lecture, again, contest this. He says the theory was unsupported because there was not any maize remained in the houses to show that there might be a food storing place.
Finally, the passage mentioned to the theory that the Chaco great houses were used to be ceremonial places. On the other hand, the lecture argues that the mound left in these houses also contains other deposits which prove that they might simply be a building or something else instead of a ceremonial place
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 22.412803532 18% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 30.3222958057 13% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 217.0 1373.03311258 16% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 41.0 270.72406181 15% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29268292683 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.53043953444 4.04702891845 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47149122749 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 34.0 145.348785872 23% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.829268292683 0.540411800872 153% => OK
syllable_count: 60.3 419.366225166 14% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 13.0662251656 23% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.677416559 49.2860985944 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.3333333333 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 7.06452816374 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209778408069 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133209781778 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996390977243 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214177926422 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 12.0 63.6247240618 19% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.