The author states that there are three hypotheses on how the Chaco structures were used by the native people for various purposes. However, the professor is not in favor of these theories and argues on the points made in the passage.
First, the reading mentions that they could be used as residential buildings as they are similar to the apartment buildings at Taos. However, the speaker refutes this point by indicating that although there are rooms to live for hundreds of families but there are fewer fire places that can fulfill the needs of daily cooking is only for ten families at the most. This contraindicates as to what is given in the passage.
Second, the author tells that another idea is that these buildings could be used to store crops such as grain maize for long periods. To counter the author’s view point, lecturer explains that during excavation, archeologists did not find any evidences that support this notion. He further clears his point by telling that if they were used for storage purpose then some proofs such as remains of big containers or grain on the floor should have been found during excavation but there is no such proof.
Third, the passage suggests that it might be possible that the buildings could have been used for special ceremonies as large numbers of broken pots are found at the site. But the lecturer cast doubts on this notion as well. He states that there are many more items have been found at the site along with broken pots that is building material such as stones, sand and construction tools. This is an evidence of some construction going on at the site and broken pots could be the left over
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Writing testWriting task 1 (a letter)You have recently been on a business trip to see some equipment that your company needs. Write a letter to the company that owns this equipment and say– Describe the equipment.– Ask for the features and specificati 73
- You recently visited a store to repair your computer, but they couldn’t fix it. Write a letter to the store manager and say– What was the problem with your computer?– What happened in the store?– What do you want them to do about it? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e rooms to live for hundreds of families but there are fewer fire places that ca...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds of families but there are fewer fire places that can fulfill the needs of dai...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...found at the site along with broken pots that is building material such as stones...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and broken pots could be the left over
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'well', 'as to', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259615384615 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.173076923077 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0705128205128 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0288461538462 0.0435111971325 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0224358974359 0.0277247811725 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.163461538462 0.128828473217 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0544871794872 0.0370669169778 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40150872706 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0160256410256 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00320512820513 0.00154638098197 207% => OK
Determiners: 0.112179487179 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0224358974359 0.0158828679856 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0160256410256 0.0114777025283 140% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1669.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 271.125827815 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77508650519 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.294117647059 0.374372842146 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21107266436 0.287516216867 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.138408304498 0.187439937562 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0726643598616 0.113142543107 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40150872706 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 54.8602164589 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0833333333 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5855365021 49.3711431718 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.7502111507 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 45.1905997693 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.12857142857 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612079639773 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111189445288 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.058019024688 0.0787303798458 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.625974318115 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122740665758 0.139662658121 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290665656122 0.266732575781 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923617651392 0.103435571967 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.361406611636 0.414875509568 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0168626610021 0.0530846634433 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.4418673105 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625447185414 0.0528353158467 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.