The lecture claims that receiving the eco-certification will benefit American wood company. This doesn’t agree with that of the passage, which assumes that the wood companies pay less attention to the certificate.
First of all, the lecture arguing that American consumers don’t treat all the advertisement the same. They prefer to trust the independent agencies rather than companies. A company with a certificate issued by those agencies definitely earns more trust from consumers. However, the passage refutes that American consumers don’t trust the advertising because of the overexposure of the advantage of mediocre products.
Secondly, lecture suggests that consumers choose cheaper product instead of expensive one only when the latter price is much higher than the former one. Otherwise consumers choice will end up with the quality rather than the price. This statement is not in line with what is written in the passage that consumers are strongly motivated by the price so they will choose the uncertificated company with lower price.
The third point of difference between the lecture and passage concerns that if the certificate will boost US companies’ selling domestically. The lecture asserts that it’s necessary for American companies to get certificate if they want to become more competitive than those certificated foreign companies in the market. Nevertheless, the passage contends that the targets of American companies are almost US people who are satisfied with the merchandize.
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 68
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 78
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 69
Essay evaluation report
the passage refutes that American consumers don’t trust
Description: 'refute' something or somebody, not 'refute' that...
consumers choose cheaper product instead of expensive one
consumers choose cheaper products instead of expensive ones
consumers choose a cheaper product instead of an expensive one
Sentence: Otherwise consumers choice will end up with the quality rather than the price.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to consumers and choice
The third point of difference between the lecture and passage concerns that if the certificate will boost US companies’ selling domestically.
The third point of difference between the lecture and passage concerns whether the certificate will boost US companies’ selling domestically. //'concern' something, not 'concern' that...
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Words: 233 250
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 233 250
No. of Characters: 1250 1200
No. of Different Words: 123 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.907 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.365 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.869 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.02 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.626 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.122 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
However, the passage refutes
However, the passage refutes this assumption by saying that American consumers don’t trust the advertising because of the overexposure of the advantage of mediocre products.
Is this sentence correct?
It is correct, but don't put
It is correct, but don't put a lot of 'of' in one sentence/clause, like: because of the overexposure of the advantage of mediocre products.
better:
A of B
confusing:
A of B of C
for average:
for average:
independent TOEFL writing: 408 words
integrated TOEFL writing: 270 words
The rule is: the more, the better. but don't do it deliberately. Try the content you think it is enough or you feel comfortable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ice is much higher than the former one. Otherwise consumers choice will end up with the q...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...almost US people who are satisfied with the merchandize.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69565217391 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02117292162 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7691748918 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.166666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410444375492 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150292734048 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541963974641 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246323270324 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039074680531 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.8541721854 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.2367328918 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.