The reading and the lecture are both about cars and how they can change cars into using hydrogen-based fuel. The author of the reading believes that changing it into hydrogen will cost less and be more accessible. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She states that hydrogen would actually cost more and actually not the solution to the problem.
First of all, the author states that it would be a lot easier to get hydrogen. It is mentioned that you can just get hydrogen from water. This pont is challenged by the lecturer. She mentions that hydrogen may be in water, but it is very hard to physically get it. Furthermore, she argues that hydrogen needs to be in liquid state and has to use a machine with negative 253 degrees which is extremely hard to get.
Secondly the author points out that hydrogen based cells are attractive because they solve many of the world problems with pollution. The article notes that gas would pollute by a lot, but hydrogen would not pollute anything. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that hydrogen indeed does pollute. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the car would not be polluting, but the factories making this would because purifying the hydrogen will need to burn a lot of coal and gas.
Finally, the author states that it would cost less. The article establishes that you can have much more hydrogen as fuel than just regular gas. The lecturer on the other hand says that it is hard for hydrogen to be cheap. She puts forth on the idea by stating that the machine that needs to be use is made from platinum; thus this machine is too expensive to have.
- Imagine that your city government has given permission for a major company to build a large factory near your neighborhood Do you think this is a good idea Why or why not Explain your position using specific reasons and examples 80
- Adapted from Eric Klinenberg Viewpoint Air Conditioning Will Be the End of Us 2013 by Time Inc Originally published July 17 2013 1 Earlier this week as the temperature in New York City hit the upper 90s and the heat index topped 100 my utility provider is 51
- As you read the passage below, consider how Leo W. Gerard usesevidence, such as facts and examples, to support claimsreasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidencestylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents will learn more from their children than their children will learn from them 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... will cost less and be more accessible. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65187713311 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35897662177 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491467576792 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4924590395 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7222222222 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215542819463 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714903552064 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568552677936 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140160462315 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290261661114 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.