TPO 11
Young people are reading fewer literature-books, and it results in negative consequences. The idea is criticized in the lecture.
Foremost, the reading suggests that if people do not read literature-novels, they would not exercise their imagination. The professor, however, refutes this point, claiming that many other books such as historical, scientific, and political books have high quality; consequently, these books exercise the brain, similar to how literature does.
Secondly, according to the reading, people are wasting their time by reading super fiction, watching movies, or listening to music. In contrast, the professor outlined her objection pointing out that listening to a meaningful music piece or watching an extraordinary movie is not less beneficial than reading a literature-novel.
According to the professor, movies and music do not have a lower cultural standard; in fact, they can contribute to the culture with more diversity; therefore, they are as fruitful.
Finally, the author wraps his argument positioning that, people are missing out on modern novels with high quality. While the professor claims that the quality of modern literature is considerably low; even the old readers wouldn't consider reading such kind of books.
While the reading accuses the reader and publishers of the lack of audience, the professor claims that the writers caused the poor standards.
To sum up, both the author and the professor hold conflicting views about the literature, and they would have a hard time finding common ground about the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | meet96300 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | Alana Gerber | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | khatuntajkera | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Pooja dave | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... considerably low; even the old readers wouldnt consider reading such kind of books. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in fact, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55416666667 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05497942801 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9698844881 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336886799117 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129524569617 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847933240463 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153482476075 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757009239674 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.