TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the reading are about the a study which revealed that young generation people are reading less literature. However, the lecturer casts doubt on whatever presented in the reading and refutes every of the reasons given in the text. She does not feel that people are reading less nowadays then they used to be.
First of all, lecturer states that if people are not reading literature it does not mean that they are missing out important benefits of reading. Moreover, for reading book does not have to be of literature, it can be of any kind like science, physics, general studies etc. These types of books are also creative and stimulate the imagination of people.
Secondly, professor puts forth the another point that if people are not reading literature books it does not mean that they are not reading good books. There are plenty of cultural books based on some movies, song videos, reading web page etc, people are more attracted to such kind of books these days. Furthermore culture have been changed so do the pattern of their reading habits. Many forms of other things are also available these days to do like watching movies and all which also help people to improve their thinking capacity and enhance their knowledge in whatever field they want.
In addition to aforementioned points, lecturer finally mentions that Sometimes it is authors fault that he or she can not attract the people to study their literature. Modern literature is very difficult to understand, so people go for other options which are more convinient for them to understand. People nowadays prefer to go for smart options which are not low in standards but according to public refering lot of literature is a boring.
Thus professor casts on all the reasons presented by the author to present that young people are reading less literature nowadays rather than earlier times.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition among friends usually has a negative effect on friendship Use details and examples to support your opinion 77
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children's development. 70
- TPO-44 INDEPENDENT TASKSome people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things togeth 71
- Many filmmakers made movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch movie first. What do you think? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
The lecture and the reading are about the a study which revealed that young generat...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...l that people are reading less nowadays then they used to be. First of all, lectu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...acted to such kind of books these days. Furthermore culture have been changed so do the pat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ering lot of literature is a boring. Thus professor casts on all the reasons pres...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96518987342 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.451228727 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51582278481 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8563378127 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409933728669 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154106904553 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772155638958 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237952390825 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397151636194 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.