TPO 12
The article states that one of the recently published paintings is attributable to Jane Austen's full-length portrait, whereas before that only existed a rather amateurish sketch of her. The lecture, on the other hand, explains that the shreds of evidence provided by the reading is not convincing regarding the validity of the painting and refutes each of the reasons stated by the author.
First, the reading explains that the family of Jane Austen has approved of the painting; that is, the subject of the portrait is indeed her. However, the professor refutes this point by mentioning that Jane Austen passed away seventy years ago. Therefore, his currently alive relatives and descendants could not have seen her in person to authorize the painting.
Second, the article mentions the resemblance between the authorized sketch and the published full-length painting, that is both of them are depicting the famous novel writer. However, the lecture contends that the subject of both paintings could be one of Jane's relatives. He mentions that the Austen family was a large one, and any of her cousins could look like her. In fact, some are to believe that the subject is one of jane's descendant niece.
Third, the reading uses the painter, Ozias Humphry, as the evidence, that is the affluent family of Austen was among those who could afford such an expensive artist. Also, the painting style of the portrait is similar to Humphry's style. The lecturer opposes this point by stating that the method is the only evidence for this limited claim, whereas there are pieces of evidence that the painting could have not to be created in the time that Jane was a teenager. This is because the background canvas was not available in Austen's town by the time she was twenty-seven, and no longer a teenager. So, the painting is, at its best, a few years younger than what the author states.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95911949686 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50755750211 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512578616352 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9634214367 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417417243241 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139921178467 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918530388359 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254825647651 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292096034616 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.