Both listening and speaking discuss the fossil trade. The lecture tells the negative consequence of follis trade and provides several reasons such as losing public interest, preventing some valuable discoveries and destroying relic. However, the speaker says trading in not bad as it present in lecture and refutes each author’s reasons.
First of all, the lecture claims that the fossils are trading between private collector and sellers. This trade prevent interest of public because not everyone can have access to see them. However, if it is in the museums, everyone can see them. The speaker opposes it. According to the speaker, public is in great exposure with trading of fossils and even museum and library have chance to buy them.
Secondly, fossils sellers damage some possible discoveries about extinct life form. They want to find rarest piece to maximize their profit. This situation prevent some researches. The speaker find it is not realistic. The sellers show the fossils first scientist first and then they sell it.
Lastly,valuable scientific evidence are often destroyed by fossils collectors. They do not pay attention detail which surrounds fossil. They do not interested how it lie or its exact position. These details are significant for scientist. The speaker opposed it and say they are interested with discovery of fossils.
- : Neighbors Are The People Who Live Near Us. In Your Opinion, What Are The Qualities Of A Good Neighbor? Use Specific Details And Examples In Your Answer. 66
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 60
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, preventing some valuable discoveries and destroying relic. However, the speak...
^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'presents'?
Suggestion: presents
...e speaker says trading in not bad as it present in lecture and refutes each author&apos...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the rarest'.
Suggestion: find the rarest
...s about extinct life form. They want to find rarest piece to maximize their profit. This si...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'prevents'.
Suggestion: prevents
...o maximize their profit. This situation prevent some researches. The speaker find it is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , valuable
...t first and then they sell it. Lastly,valuable scientific evidence are often destroyed...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lies'?
Suggestion: lies
...s fossil. They do not interested how it lie or its exact position. These details ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38785046729 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65346919493 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61214953271 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6432585213 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.0555555556 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8888888889 21.698381199 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36368556057 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109924480783 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079216988809 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21652628236 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730452888305 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.