TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar

The reading and the speaker discuss selling fossils for private owners from different perspectives. The speaker negates all the ideas has mentioned in the article. He says that the advantages of commercial fossils greatly outweigh it disadvantages.
First of all, the author of the reading points out that people suffer a lot because private collectors do not allow them to view their collections. This point is challenged by the speaker. He restates the fact that since the private owners hunt the fossils for trade, they bring people many chances to see the fossils. Moreover, they tend to show their collections in public school or library routinely.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that scientists lose the access to some significant evidence. Therefore, they miss important potential to discover the extinction of life forms. The speaker rebuts this idea by saying that before the commercial trade the fossils, the fossils need to be examined and evaluated by scientists first. Therefore, scientists do not lose any chance to detect the life forms from the fossils.
Finally, the author of the reading states that private fossils collectors ruin the valuable scientific evidence with the fossils they excavate because they are untrained and uninterested in document that disclose about animal life in the past. The speaker, on the other hand, opposes this point by saying that is it better to have some unearth fossils than completely keep them in undiscovered.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27004219409 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68985273426 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0128977448 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400344506693 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126927000779 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872070971139 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245916489992 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538853809246 0.0443174109184 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.