TPO 14
Both the lecture anfd the passage are discussing whether salvage logging, a method by wich old dead trees are removed from forest ereas, is beneficial or not both ecologically and economically. The assignment suggests that this method provide multidimentional advantages. However, the professor casts doubt on this calim and provide three main reasons vindicating her viepoints.
Firt of all, the passage claims that dead trees will not be removed even during a long temporal period. If we don't remove these dead trees after a devatating fire, there would be no room for new trees to grow in the cramped spaces. On the other hand, the lecturer challenges this specific argument reasoning that these dead trees will provide soil in the future and if we clean them up there will be no source of soil in the future.
Secondly, the writer suggests that new generation of insects which locate in such dead trees can effect harmfully the surrownding environment. The professor, on the other hand, oppose this argument according to the fact that these insects will provide no harm and the trees can live with insects population lasting for hundreds of years. The lecturer mentions other harmful insects and birds which are potentially harmful if we apply the salvage logging program.
Finally, the economical aspect of salvage logging is important for the author. In terms of economic benefits this program is accounted beneficial for the writer. However the professor collide with this point of view, because of small and indurable effect of program on economy. She asserts that the program itself needs large amount of money and will provide only limited temporary job positions. The wood however is useless from the lecturere's viewpoint.
- TPO 14 81
- Integrated TPO 16 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Independent 21Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 73
- TPO 16 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...en during a long temporal period. If we dont remove these dead trees after a devatat...
^^^^
Line 13, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...is accounted beneficial for the writer. However the professor collide with this point o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21276595745 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60496415283 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9733801665 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350108070198 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110741412519 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661915306567 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1912436693 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348415614067 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.