The article the benefits of salvage logging environmentally and economically and provides three reasons of supports. Conversely, the professor states that salvage logging has serious drwabacks on forest and economic, and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that salvage logging create room for fresh tree growth by removing the remains of dead trees. The professor opposes this point by stating that cleaning up the forest would not necessary benefit the grwoth of trees. Decompose materials actually enrich soil with so many nutrients. So, if it would have been removed by salvage logging, the soil would lack important nutrients that necessary for trees growth.
Second, the article claims that salvage logging helps minimize the dangers of insect infestation, such as the spruce bark beetle, by removing rotting wood and consequently,improving the health of the forest. The professor, on the other hand, states that this point is true, not not all insects are harmful. She adds that spruce bark beetle, that have lived for 100 years in the forst, does not cause a damage, moreover, birds need insects. As a result, salvage logging would be more harmful than insects.
Third, the reading posits that slavage logging is useful for industries as supplying them with woods, In addition to creating jobs opportunities. However, The professor refutes this point by explaining these economic resukts, that comes from slavage logging, are temporary and do not lasting for long period. She explains that during the process of extinguishing the fires in forests, helicopters, vehicles would use in that process, therefore, there will be a huge expenses. Also, since slavage logging companies are only hiring ousiders and locals, there are no benefits for people. She also adds that these jobs are temporary and not permenant.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 85
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 90
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , improving
...y removing rotting wood and consequently,improving the health of the forest. The professor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...r hand, states that this point is true, not not all insects are harmful. She adds that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'expense'?
Suggestion: expense
...rocess, therefore, there will be a huge expenses. Also, since slavage logging companies ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34470989761 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72014722443 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1967118802 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399335944786 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125091410607 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873179131928 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229221312172 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634220025238 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.