The article states that several meausres proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Austrialia and provides three reasons of supports. Conversely, the porfessor states that none of these measures will stop the spread of cane toad. All measures that presented by the author’s were unsucessful in preventing the spread of cane toad. And she refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that a national fence would prevent the spread of the cane toad in Australia. However, the professor refutes this point by stating that building a fence would not stop the spread. Young cane toad and its egg used rivers, and streams to transport. So, when the cane toad eggs float on the water, it would carry out to other side of the river, to other location. tehrefore, if we could located the cane toad, it would be useless. She concludes that a national fence would be so uneffective in stopping the spread og the cane toad.
Second, the reading avers that the toads could be captured and destroyed by volunteers. The professor, on ther hand, opposes this idea by stating that this could have destroyed other native species too. SInce those volunteers untrained, they could not have been able to recognize the young cane toad and native frogs species. Becuase those two species are relatively similar and its hard to distinguish among them. Therefore, capturign and destroying the cane toad would not easy and sucessful way to prevent the spread of them.
Third, the reading posits that a diesease-causing virous will be developed to control the cane toad populations. The professor disagrees with this point by saying this is a bad idea for the ecosystem. For example, the virus would infect certain reptile and amphbian species that inhabit the South America. SO, when these species transport from Australia to South America, the virus will spread and attack the native cane toad. Since the toads in South America are vital part of the ecosytem, this could lead to devastate the ecosystem there. Therefore, the development of virus-causing disease to control the cane toad popluations in AUstralia would have negative consequences on the ecosystem in the other places.
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 75
- ZOOS 60
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 80
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 76
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tehrefore
...r side of the river, to other location. tehrefore, if we could located the cane toad, it ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'locate'
Suggestion: locate
... other location. tehrefore, if we could located the cane toad, it would be useless. She...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... development of virus-causing disease to control the cane toad popluations in AUs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 363.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06336088154 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6266982885 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471074380165 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5687238084 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5238095238 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47619047619 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.596605398857 0.272083759551 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2034369423 0.0996497079465 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105724604712 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.384236034789 0.162205337803 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469462068332 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.