The reading and the lecture are both about the fires and severe storms in a forest. The article states that fire and storms in a forest cause many drawbacks, and explained about salvage logging which gives more benefits to economy and forests. However, the lecture explains that rise in salvage logging has a significant damage in forests.
Firstly, the reading claims that after the fire in forests the dead trees should be removed otherwise it takes a long time to decompose and occupies large space which does not allow other trees to grow. Furthermore, salvage logging helps to remove trees easily and keeps the room fresh. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that cleaning does not allow the growth of the trees in a forest. Moreover, decomposition enriches the soil and also helps for future growth of trees. Besides salvage logging leads to nutrients deficiency in the soil where trees can not grow.
Secondly, the article posits that decaying wood would affect the insects in the forest. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this point and says that as the population of insects has been increased over thousand years the loss of insects will not take place. In addition, it leads to a long-run growth of birds and other insects.
Finally, the text explains that salvage logging has more economic benefits and provides more job opportunities for local residents. Nevertheless, the professor argues this point by saying that replacing the wood after the natural disaster is more expensive because helicopters should be used. Furthermore, jobs are temporary and will be given to more experienced and trained people rather than local residents.
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 71
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 81
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant damage'.
Suggestion: significant damage
...plains that rise in salvage logging has a significant damage in forests. Firstly, the reading cla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owth of the trees in a forest. Moreover, decomposition enriches the soil and also...
^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...helicopters should be used. Furthermore, jobs are temporary and will be given to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12408759124 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48222408559 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4223597591 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442302022097 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140443681018 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635145140116 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22834688353 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858605484183 0.0443174109184 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.