The lecture indicates that controlling cane toads are not easy to control and the methods that reading mentioned not only were not helpful but also could be harmful for the other species . First, reading says that Australian tried to use fence to prevent of spreading cane toad whereas lecture says that young toads and eggs are living in the streams and rivers and water will carry them through the direction that it goes. so cane toads will spread. in addition young cane toads can go through the fence so this method is totally inefficient. Second, in the reading we read that, Australian asked volunteers to capture the toads and destroy them but the professor said untrained volunteer could not recognize the cane toad from native frogs because when they are so young they are so similar so they destroyed native frogs.Third, reading indicates that researcher used virus against cane toads to control their reproductions but the professor mentioned that spreading virus can cause a lot of disaster in south America when the country imports some species from Australia the remaining virus in the cane toad's body can easily spread to the other toads which is disaster because cane toads are native species in South America.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... methods that reading mentioned not only were not helpful but also could be harmf...
^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o could be harmful for the other species . First, reading says that Australian tr...
^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... could be harmful for the other species . First, reading says that Australian tri...
^^
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...hem through the direction that it goes. so cane toads will spread. in addition you...
^^
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hat it goes. so cane toads will spread. in addition young cane toads can go throug...
^^
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... it goes. so cane toads will spread. in addition young cane toads can go through the fen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 827, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Third
... similar so they destroyed native frogs.Third, reading indicates that researcher used...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds are native species in South America.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, third, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98048780488 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3695138948 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 41.0 21.2450331126 193% => OK
Sentence length SD: 230.427776103 49.2860985944 468% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.2 110.228320801 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 21.698381199 189% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516980907303 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.307425366396 0.0996497079465 309% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856700726509 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.516980907303 0.162205337803 319% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.3589403974 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 53.8541721854 71% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.498013245 175% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.