TPO 15,Cane toads
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about three means of stopping spread of cane toads in australia. considering this, the reading consider these methods effective. The professor, on the other hand, not only reputes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the way the reading just argued. The lecture, demonstrates three reasons to reject points in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that construction a national fence will prevent cane toads from moving to not colonized part of australia. As stated by the professor, building a national fence is not effective due to the fact that toads' eggs and young toads can be found in water; so, the can carry with the follow of water to different sides, and it is easy for them to establish a new habitat for themselves. Hence, establishing cannot stop spreading cane toads.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that cane toads can be voluntarily deteriorated, the professor illustrates that even though capturing and destroying cane toads by volunteers can be successful, it can endangers native frogs who are similar to toad in young age.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the virus developed by researchers can avoid cane toads form maturing and reproducing, saying that using a virus can be terrible and have serious effect on cane toad’s original habitat because some Australian reptiles and amphibians are transferred to other countries by researchers, which can be cause the spread the virus in cane toads original habitat, in the south america, and endangers them. cane toads are part of American ecosystem, destroying them will be caused an ecological disaster in south america ecosystem.
All in all, the professor maintains that the three measures offered in the passage are likely either to be unsuccessful, or will adversely affect environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
...ping spread of cane toads in australia. considering this, the reading consider these method...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons to reject points in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... found in water; so, the can carry with the follow of water to different sides, and it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'endanger'
Suggestion: endanger
...by volunteers can be successful, it can endangers native frogs who are similar to toad in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...her countries by researchers, which can be cause the spread the virus in cane toads orig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cane
... the south america, and endangers them. cane toads are part of American ecosystem, d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19303797468 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7939633091 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.075993916 49.2860985944 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.181818182 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509320435332 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176602388971 0.0996497079465 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130122444747 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264684606275 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141843440869 0.0443174109184 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.