The reading and the lecture are both about the difficulty in uncovering and studying the old archaeological sites in England. The reading provides three reasons that hinder such process, however, the speaker casts doubts on each one of them.
First, the article claims that because of the huge construction work that have been done during the recent years, a lot of these precious artifacts have been lost and not preserved. The professor, on the other hand, points out that the government has issued a law that prevents any construction before examining the land for any possible archaeological remains.
Second, the author of the reading argues that there is no financial funding for the excavating work from the government. The speaker, in contrast, explains that the new building regulations force the construction companies to pay any expenditure required for excavating the land before the beginning of the construction. As, a result, the financial support is not a problem anymore.
Third, the text claims that there no vacancy for archaeological jobs in the universities, and the that kind of job has not become popular or profitable. The professor refutes this point as well. He elaborates that with the new laws and the required money before any building process, the career of the archaeologists has flourished and became more lucrative to the extent that created many professional people in that field of study and work.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- TPO-11 - Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 66
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 75
- TPO 31 – Integrated 73
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, well, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21551724138 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91531025591 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6053688857 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212070939882 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726401476721 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408783273473 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115449611501 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282630338079 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.