Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the archaeology development in the the United Kingdom. The reading passage proposes threee problems developing archaeology faced. However, the lecture refutes these problems by introducing the new guildline which was published in 1900.
First, the reading passage thinks due to the rapid construction in the United Kingdom, lots of artifacts were not preserved. On the other hand, the lecturer dispute it. Thanks to the new guideline, an area should be examed carefully by archaeologists before construction. If the area is valuable and interesed by archaeologists, the builder has to make a preserved plan, either to build around the valuable site or exavate the artifacts.
Second, the writer points out the finacial support for archaeological research was not enough. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that according to the new guideline, instead of the government, the construction company needs to pay for the research from the very beginning until the end of the research.
Last but not the least, the writer says that it was hard to have a career in archaelogy, while the lecturers doesn't think so. Because of the preserve plan, the construction company has to hire a lot of archaeologists in different stage. As a result the company offers a lot of job from planing the preserved plan to processing the data. Therefore, it not only increases the job opportunities but also teaches numbers of experts in archaeology.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 60
- TPO Integrated 49 76
- TPO 34 integrated 86
- T P O 50 integrated 3
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... discuss the archaeology development in the the United Kingdom. The reading passage pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... discuss the archaeology development in the the United Kingdom. The reading passage pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...reer in archaelogy, while the lecturers doesnt think so. Because of the preserve plan,...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t of archaeologists in different stage. As a result the company offers a lot of jo...
^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...t stage. As a result the company offers a lot of job from planing the preserved plan to proc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07508031299 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584745762712 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3455173159 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3846153846 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235772970727 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761438007327 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035601186459 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132902854126 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334500755375 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.