tpo 17
The main idea of both the talk and the passage is about whether the decline of birds in United State is the income of human population growth, and increasing in agriculture and pesticide use or not. Considering this, the passage claims that the number of birds will become fewer and fewer based on three reasons. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just argues. The professor demonstrates three reasons to reject options in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that birds' habitats continue to deteriorate due to the fact that people disturb them so as to build more home, mall, and offices, thanks to human population growth. As stated by the professor, urban growth affects some type of birds rather than all of them due to the fact that urban growth has provided larger habitats for other types of birds so that urban dwellers always complain about the increase in population of some types of birds such as sea goals, which has led to increase the number of its predators such as hawks in cities.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that the growth of human population has increased agriculture, and hence more lands has been deteriorated in order to prepare them for agriculture, which causes to decrease bird populations. The professor illustrates that, nowadays, in US, people tend to use less and less land for agriculture due to introduction of new plants which produce more crops, which has declined the number of agricultural lands.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the lecture that the increase in agriculture due to human populations growth, has increased the use of pesticides which are toxic for birds, saying that it is true that traditional pesticides were destructive, but now, human beings are aware of demerits of that traditional pesticides, and they apply two methods in order to solve the problem. First, they develop much less pesticide. Secondly, they are growing resistant crops that do not harm the birds at all.
All in all, the professor maintains that the reading’s arguments is not convincing.
- tpo 41 70
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important for the young people than theyare to the older people. 73
- TPO 34 70
- tpo 27 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sons to reject options in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ue to the fact that people disturb them so as to build more home, mall, and offices, tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...pare them for agriculture, which causes to decrease bird populations. The professor illustr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populations'' or 'population's'?
Suggestion: populations'; population's
...he increase in agriculture due to human populations growth, has increased the use of pestic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'such as', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256157635468 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.142857142857 0.158904122519 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0935960591133 0.0723426182421 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0467980295567 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0197044334975 0.0277247811725 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142857142857 0.128828473217 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0320197044335 0.0370669169778 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66109067709 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0344827586207 0.0208969081088 165% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110837438424 0.128158765124 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00246305418719 0.0158828679856 16% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0197044334975 0.0114777025283 172% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2217.0 1645.83664459 135% => OK
No of words: 368.0 271.125827815 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02445652174 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339673913043 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255434782609 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127717391304 0.113142543107 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66109067709 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502717391304 0.539623497131 93% => OK
Word variations: 53.6546275178 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.6666666667 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.256197383 49.3711431718 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 184.75 132.220823453 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.878197800319 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 56.2101449275 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 2.05882352941 1.90840788429 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.66860487108 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.200697731144 0.142949733639 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0861635117766 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.712386867512 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.21437203921 0.139662658121 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.322903750974 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128108440427 0.103435571967 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416784657915 0.414875509568 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0651081906811 0.0530846634433 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433602624445 0.40443939384 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124952175227 0.0528353158467 236% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.