Human people are increasing day by day, so what will be the impact on birds population due to change of human population is the concerning matter for both the reading and the lecture. The authors avers that the number of bird population will continuously decrease in future and he establishes his point by providing three most import reasons for it. However, the professor states the idea that due to increasing of mankind, the birds population will not vanish.
First of all, the author claims that bird's natural habitats will not remain at all due to expanding use of land for human activities; as a result, the birds will not get place to live in future. This point is challenged by the professor, and he says that it is not a good prediction since only few types of birds will affected by this urbanization. Moreover, there are many birds whose live at city areas, and they successfully habitats in there.
Secondly, since to satisfy human need farmland will be extended in areas where wild bird live, birds will be faced severe problems for its habitats, is claimed by the writer in the reading. However, the lecturer rebuts this assumption by informing that the recent technological advancement will change the situation. He also mentions that now people start to cultivate more yielding crops which need much less areas and produce huge food, so people will not need to destroy birds' natural habitats.
Finally, the reading estimates that since people will use more pesticides to protect crops from insects and pests, those toxic pesticides will be the part of the food chain in which the bird survive. As a result, a large portion of birds will vanish from this word. The professor, on the other hand, states that author's prediction is not correct, and claims that no such thing will occur in future because people will not use traditional poisonous elements in that time. He also mentions that people will use less toxic chemical to control insects, and they might start to grow pest resistant crops. As a result, pest resistant trees will not be the responsibility of vanishing birds population.
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 73
- Integrated writing - TPO 19 76
- TPO-21 Integrated WritingGenetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, grow fast 73
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 30 question 1 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'aver'.
Suggestion: aver
...he reading and the lecture. The authors avers that the number of bird population will...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
... that due to increasing of mankind, the birds population will not vanish. First o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t, the birds will not get place to live in future. This point is challenged by the profes...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...tion since only few types of birds will affected by this urbanization. Moreover, there a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun areas is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ate more yielding crops which need much less areas and produce huge food, so people ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 5.04856512141 416% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90782122905 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55298246849 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.612217442 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497597753384 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199846005642 0.0996497079465 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763834933468 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326257290401 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314174310782 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.