The article states that the extinction of birds and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that these three reasons are unconvincing and there is no extinction of the birds and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that human population continues to become large, bird’s nature habitats will continue to extinct. If the regular areas suitable for birds such as forest, and wetland keep declining, so, the size of birds will decline. The professor refutes this point, he states that increasing in the human population might be the reason for extinction some kinds of birds at the same time might be better for growing other kinds of birds.
Second, the article claims that agriculture activities enhance to keep rate with increasing the human population. Increasing in agriculture activities leads to decrease the nature habitat of birds. However, the professor says that the united state uses less land for agriculture every year. Using the land for agriculture to produce crops just for feeding the human population, as the results, there is no disturbance of the bird habitats.
Third, the reading claims that the human settlement and agriculture increases, the uses of the chemicals such as pesticides to kill the crop's pests, which are poisons for the birds since it goes into water and food chain of birds causes declining of birds. The professor says that this claim is problematic; he explains that enhancing the awareness of the human regarding the harm effects of chemicals on birds leads them to use less toxic products or growing pest-resistance crops which are not harmful to the birds.
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 68
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 70
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Most advertisement make products seems much better than they really are. 60
- TPO INTEGRATED 33 3
Essay evaluation report
If the regular areas suitable for birds
If the regular areas are suitable for birds
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 269 250
No. of Characters: 1355 1200
No. of Different Words: 131 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.037 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.572 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.455 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.032 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.424 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.659 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.162 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... refute each of the authors reasons. First, the reading states that human pop...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er for growing other kinds of birds. Second, the article claims that agricult...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...no disturbance of the bird habitats. Third, the reading claims that the human...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'as for', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28762541806 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.160535117057 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0735785953177 0.0723426182421 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0167224080268 0.0435111971325 38% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0133779264214 0.0277247811725 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137123745819 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0367892976589 0.0370669169778 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66280013399 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267558528428 0.0208969081088 128% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.133779264214 0.128158765124 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0133779264214 0.0158828679856 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0066889632107 0.0114777025283 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1679.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 269.0 271.125827815 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24163568773 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35687732342 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275092936803 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193308550186 0.187439937562 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14126394052 0.113142543107 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66280013399 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498141263941 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.6587976223 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4545454545 21.7502111507 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2448007576 49.3711431718 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.636363636 132.220823453 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 21.7502111507 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.9638391348 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 2.42105263158 1.90840788429 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.670583576985 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.206116771043 0.142949733639 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.132039116332 0.0787303798458 168% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.71837785863 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148123964892 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358936072027 0.266732575781 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844752362374 0.103435571967 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.491116506849 0.414875509568 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.06818194673 0.0530846634433 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.494315421846 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836671074844 0.0528353158467 158% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.