The reading states that the number of birds,in upcoming year, are likely to decline and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, states that the claim made by reading is unconvincing and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that human's population and habitat tend to increase, leading to destruction of habitat of birds. The professor confutes this point by saying that increase in human habitat provides suitable habitat for increase in bird's number. Further, he states that city dwellers and residents usually complain about the increase in number of pigeon,sea gal, and Hawk are seen in human habitat due to presence of numerous prey such as pigeon, in a human habitat.
Second, the reading posits that increase in agricultural activity leads to destruction of natural abode of birds. The professor, on the other hand, asserts that use of agricultural land is decreasing per year in United States. According to professor, due to use of new types of crops, the use of land for agriculture has decreased because these new crops yields more per unit area than the past used crops.
Third, the article maintains that the use of pesticides may have an adverse effect on birds. The professor counter this points explaining that the 2 new approaches have been used to tackle with this problem. We have learned that now, there is a use of less toxic pesticide and new kind of crops- genetically modified pesticide resistance crops. And this new crops will decrease the use of pesticide; thus, now, birds are free from the peril of pesticide toxic effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... reading states that the number of birds,in upcoming year, are likely to decline an...
^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...sons. First, the article claims that humans population and habitat tend to increase...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sea
...n about the increase in number of pigeon,sea gal, and Hawk are seen in human habitat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, well, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05283018868 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56683117589 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1067297623 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293992530078 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103405809169 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544087095006 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144276481338 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637861278584 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.