TPO 17 – task 1

Essay topics:

TPO 17 – task 1

Actually, both the passage and the lecturer discuss about considerable decrease in the number of birds that has been occurred during recent century. Although, the article brings three theories for proving the thought that the population of birds will be declined definitely, the professor puts factors under question by scrutinizing them. According to the lecture, none of the statements are convincing.

First, as the passage mentioned, expansion of human population; moreover, converting of natural environment to residential places, has limited the habitats of birds which lead them to be disappeared; however, the professor doesn't reinforce the claim by emphasizing the fact that not only haven’t the habitats been restricted but birds have found more place in order to live; furthermore, the number of some kinds of birds have been grown albeit the dimension od some others population shrunk.

Next, the passage indicates that the agriculture has been expanded as well as human population which destroy birds’ habitats; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn't validate mentioned idea by adding the fact that in some areas the amount of lands that are cultivated become less and less although the variety of harvest have been raised.

Finally, as the passage illustrated the pesticides have extremely effect birds’ population because it is a soluble poisonous chemical material that even leads bird to be killed; nevertheless, the professor refutes that by expressing the statement that pests have altered to a new and much lasting one which have less negative pion; in addition, they can resist better encountering pests.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-01 dorsagh 88 view
2019-09-01 dorsagh 88 view
2015-10-02 samah ae 90 view
2015-07-31 bigzee 90 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user dorsagh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... be disappeared; however, the professor doesnt reinforce the claim by emphasizing the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...been grown albeit the dimension od some others population shrunk. Next, the passa...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...os; habitats; nonetheless, the lecturer doesnt validate mentioned idea by adding the f...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 67, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
...lustrated the pesticides have extremely effect birds' population because it is a ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58565737052 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87505344068 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 21.2450331126 193% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 149.802091663 49.2860985944 304% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 233.666666667 110.228320801 212% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.8333333333 21.698381199 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 20.5 7.06452816374 290% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295873018922 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127362361423 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684497694744 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170161450216 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218233844133 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.8 13.3589403974 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 53.8541721854 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.0289183223 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.03 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.42419426049 126% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.498013245 175% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.