TPO 18 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the Torreta Taxifoha population is decreasing and, in the near future, they would extinct. Hence, the author listed three solutions to prevent this decline. However, the lecturer finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author mentioned that they can replant Torreya in the same area that it lived for a long time. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this solution and asserts that the area is strongly affected by climate change. As global warming increases, the wet line will decrease and gets dryer. Thus, it could not survive in this conditional environment.
In addition, the author points out to move them into a different location, to grow successfully in that area like forests further north. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that relocation make has a negative effect on the environment. For example, the Black Lokes tree spread quickly in the new location and it caused to die many other trees and vegetation in that place. Therefore, it could be a danger for other trees
Last but not least, the reading passage proposes to protect them in research centers. it could firmly ensure the continued survival of them. On the other hand, in contradiction to the reading passage, the lecturer claims that it is not a perfect solution because the population of Torreya is not able to resist diseases. For successful movement, the population must be large and genetically diverse. Though their population is small and genetically not various.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-01 | theprasad | 60 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | Evelinamur | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | jiyakavya | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | naziii | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 28 integrated writing 68
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the class or meet 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, it could be a danger for other trees Last but not least, the reading passage ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...es to protect them in research centers. it could firmly ensure the continued survi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12451361868 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63213394725 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587548638132 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0045676115 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188177133771 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535876632222 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448038731289 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102769277684 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442416710674 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.