Population of Torreya taxifoha is declining in the state of Florida and no one knows the cause of the decline. Some effective measures can be implemented to maintain the sustainability of the trees. Paragraph states three major suggestions to save Torreya taxifoha. Where as lecture casts doubt on the suggestions discussed in the reading.
Firstly, paragraph states the procedure of reestablishment of the trees in the micro climates which is small area with wet and cool weather. Contrary to this opinion, lecturer says that this suggestion is unlikely to be successful because weather condition of micro climates will affect due to larger region. Condition will not be cool and wet because of global warming as well as wet lands have been drained leads to dry region. This condition will not be favorable for the Torreya to flourish in the micro climates.
Secondly, reading mentions about assisted migration which depicts to plants seeds and sapling in the area far from the micro climates. This migration will help in growing of the trees from the human help. Where as, lecture casts doubt on this suggestion and states that human have black locus tree at far location. These trees spread so quickly and widely that kills other small plants. It is very difficult for Torreya to flourish along with these trees.
Thirdly, paragraph provides a suggestion to preserve Torreya trees in the research. Seeps and sapling have been monitored carefully in the research area under the supervision of scientists. While lecture rejects this opinion and states that population of the trees will not survive due to the diseases. Research can not withhold large number of trees and it is difficult to monitor number of trees.
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 83
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 76
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...r suggestions to save Torreya taxifoha. Where as lecture casts doubt on the suggestions ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r suggestions to save Torreya taxifoha. Where as lecture casts doubt on the suggestio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'plant'.
Suggestion: plant
...out assisted migration which depicts to plants seeds and sapling in the area far from ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...owing of the trees from the human help. Where as, lecture casts doubt on this suggestion...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276315789474 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789473684211 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0435111971325 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00657894736842 0.0277247811725 24% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.141447368421 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0394736842105 0.0370669169778 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61978030196 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0394736842105 0.0208969081088 189% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.128158765124 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0230263157895 0.0158828679856 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131578947368 0.0114777025283 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1715.0 1645.83664459 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08156028369 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36170212766 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308510638298 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212765957447 0.187439937562 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131205673759 0.113142543107 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61978030196 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496453900709 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.2217944568 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5882352941 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0305073547 49.3711431718 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.882352941 132.220823453 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.878197800319 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 47.4392991239 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.10606060606 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.639705130123 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146310129092 0.142949733639 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0526157533523 0.0787303798458 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.519417974236 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11105693289 0.139662658121 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.262655044545 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118132076641 0.103435571967 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375640402403 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0170504549288 0.0530846634433 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.483067955411 0.40443939384 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554375944319 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.