Both the passage and the lecture relate to a new method of advertising, which says that companies employ a person as a buzzer to encourage people to get their product. On the one hand the passage mentions three reasons opposing this way of introducing products while the lecture refutes all these reasons by saying that what the passage proclaims are as a result of misleading.
First of all, the passage states that the information are given by buzzers to people, are not reliable as they receive money from the company to appreciate their products. In contrast, the lecture supports this way of advertising by explaining that the company hires people as buzzers who has used the product and are satisfied of purchasing it. Therefore, consumer will get the truth.
In addition, the passage goes on to say that people accept the buzzer’s attitude about the products with less dubious. However, the lecture emphasizes that people will ask questions about the product from buzzers such as price, service, how long they used the product. If they cannot give answers to their questions, costumers will not buy the products.
Last but not least, the passage asserts that the buzzing will have negative effect on social relationships. Conversely, the lecture agrees this method by pointing out that the company cannot recruit buzzers if their products do not work well and have low quality.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer TPO 25 66
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 71
- TPO 50 80
- TPO 40 independent Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 80
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271317829457 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.15503875969 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0426356589147 0.0723426182421 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0426356589147 0.0435111971325 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031007751938 0.0277247811725 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139534883721 0.128828473217 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0348837209302 0.0370669169778 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59998909406 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0271317829457 0.0208969081088 130% => OK
Particles: 0.00387596899225 0.00154638098197 251% => OK
Determiners: 0.127906976744 0.128158765124 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0232558139535 0.0158828679856 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015503875969 0.0114777025283 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1401.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 230.0 271.125827815 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09130434783 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.374372842146 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304347826087 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178260869565 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104347826087 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59998909406 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 51.8121195335 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6454614838 49.3711431718 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.1 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 53.4347826087 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.94915254237 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520325476354 0.549887131256 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152296524538 0.142949733639 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0787256571371 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.676876224106 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135176964383 0.139662658121 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275371299899 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680368040902 0.103435571967 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.468121450271 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0755425502661 0.0530846634433 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381522480375 0.40443939384 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567281131252 0.0528353158467 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.