TPO 40 integrated task

The passage and the lecture are both about this fact that a human cannot live on Venus as a result of the conditions that exist there. The writer of the passage thinks that it is impossible. However, the lecturer disagrees with the claims made by the writer. He believes that it is possible even though it may not be without challenges.
First of all, the writer argues that atmospheric pressure at Venus’ surface is high compared to the pressure at Earth’s surface. The article mentions that the pressure would damage all spacecraft and humans that land on that planet. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that in the higher atmosphere the pressure gets lower. Additionally, he says there is no danger to hurt spacecraft or humans.
Secondly, the writer suggests the plant is lack of water and oxygen. In the passage, it is said that providing the plant with water and oxygen from the Earth is not practical. The lecturer refutes this by mentioning there other chemicals like carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid. He explains this by raising the point that by using and compounding those chemicals water and oxygen could be produced.
Finally, the writer posits that Venus receives a little amount of sunlight which back to space by the reflection of thick clouds. Moreover, it is stated in the article that humans would not be able to use their machines and equipment due to a lack of light that is a source to make electricity. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is the clouds are not very thick and reflect the sunlight. He points out that solar power cells can use both the direct sunlight and the sunlight are reflected by clouds