Tpo 20
The article and the lecturer both discuss about the "let it burn" policy. The text provides three reason for refuting this policy. However, the professor believes it is a natural process and the policy does not have any problems. So, he rebuts all of the reasons which have represented in the text.
Firstly, the professor avers the schorched land will be colonized by new plants. actually, the areas where destroyed can be reclamed by the seeds which tolerate high temperatures. On the other hand, the article claims this policy could breed catastrophic result for the nature and damages to park and trees.
Secondly, the lecturer asserts animal population have not been affected. Forexample, a burned woodland is an opportunity for hare. So, it culminated in food chain becomes stronger. While the text mentions the park wildlife is affected.
Finally, the professor states the tourism industry has not been affected. In other word, this kinds of fires not raises very often. Because many factors should be involved to spread the fire in a wide area. Therefore, the naural processes such as rain and wind prevent this kinds of fire. But the text contends that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist atraction. So, the fires have negative consequences for local economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One g 58
- TPO 54: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- TPO 23 60
- TPO 24 68
- TPO 30 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es not have any problems. So, he rebuts all of the reasons which have represented in the t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Actually
...d land will be colonized by new plants. actually, the areas where destroyed can be recla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...minated in food chain becomes stronger. While the text mentions the park wildlife is ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y has not been affected. In other word, this kinds of fires not raises very often. B...
^^^^
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s kinds of fires not raises very often. Because many factors should be involved to spre...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...processes such as rain and wind prevent this kinds of fire. But the text contends th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15887850467 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59421560037 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8398431738 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.9411764706 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5882352941 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248622818055 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750564620828 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561745527725 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13608393637 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664540537163 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.76 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.